State v. Bruun
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, Judge:
¶ 1 Allan Bruun and James Diderickson appeal their convictions on multiple counts of theft and one count each of a pattern of unlawful activity. They further appeal the restitution the district court ordered for those convictions. We affirm.2
BACKGROUND3
¶ 2 In 1989, a Utah County couple (the Victims) bought forty-two acres of land in Saratoga Springs. Although they sold -approximately thirteen acres over the years, they retained twenty-nine acres (the Property) as a “nest egg” to fund their retirement.
¶3 In August'2007, the Victims entered into two agreements with Braun and…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Vicom, Inc. v. Harbridge Merchant Services, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Peach Tree Bancard Corporation, Judy Elliot, James ElliotCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. SilvaUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. SquiresCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Fisher v. DavidhizarCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.