State v. Lee
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PARRISH, Justice:
1 Defendant James Earl Lee appeals his convictions for one count of aggravated kid-naping and two counts of aggravated assault. He argues that the trial court erred in failing to remove two potential jurors for cause dur ing voir dire and in failing to merge his aggravated kidnaping conviction with one of his aggravated assault convictions. He also argues that his attorney rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object to the composition of the jury panel and by failing to seek merger of the convictions. We disagree and affirm.
BACKGROUND
12 When reviewing a challenge to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. BuggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. WinfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WinfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- Brown v. Division of Water Rights of the Department of Natural ResourcesUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KingUtah Supreme Court · 2006
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.