Legal Opinion

State v. Bond

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2015No. Case No. 20130361PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice HIMONAS,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

1 1 A jury convicted Martin Bond of several heinous crimes, including aggravated kidnapping and aggravated murder. Mr. Bond challenges his convictions on three grounds. First, he argues the prosecutor committed misconduct by calling Benjamin Rettig, Mr. Bond's codefendant, to testify when Mr. Ret-tig had indicated an intention to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and, therefore, the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial. 1 Second, he contends the prosecutor violated his rights under…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. HummelUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. GriffinUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. SilvaUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. WilderUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API