Sowels v. LABORERS'INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NA
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal an order of summary judgment entered pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1), failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, in favor of defendant Laborers’ International Union of North America (hereinafter the international).
Summary judgment under this sub-rule is proper only if, after an examination of the pleadings, and accepting plaintiff’s well-pleaded allegations as true, a determination can be made that plaintiff’s claim is "so clearly unenforceable as a matter of law that no factual development could possibly sustain it”. Gartside v Young Men’s Christian Ass’n, 87…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Coronado Coal Co. v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Schmitzer v. Misener-Bennett Ford, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Vikman v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 1269Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- JR Norton Co. v. GENERAL TEAMSTERS, WAREHOUSEMENCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Calex Corp. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Ron’s Last Chance, Inc v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.