Legal Opinion
JR Norton Co. v. GENERAL TEAMSTERS, WAREHOUSEMEN
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 3, 1989No. H001762PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
General Teamsters, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local 890 (the Local) appeals from a jury verdict awarding compensatory and punitive damages to J. R. Norton Company for losses caused by negligent supervision of strikers during a 1982 labor dispute. The Local contends that the trial court gave conflicting instructions, erroneously giving the California common law agency liability and preponderance-of-the-evidence standard of proof, and correctly instructing in the language of section 6 of the Norris-LaGuardia Act (29 U.S.C.A. § 106). The Local maintains that the section 6…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Theodor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- MacIsaac v. Waste Management Collection & Recycling, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Weeks v. Baker & McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Bihun v. AT & T Information Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Notrica v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society v. City of Moreno ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.