Legal Opinion

Mracek v. Bryn Mawr Hospital

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 2009No. Civil Action 08-296PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT F. KELLY, Senior District Judge.

Roland C. Mracek (“Mracek”) brought this action against Bryn Mawr Hospital and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (“Intuitive”) for damages arising out of strict product liability, strict malfunction liability, negligence, and breach of warranty in connection with a prostatectomy 1 performed with an operative robot called the “da Vinci” which was manufactured by Intuitive. Presently before this Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Intuitive. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is granted with regard to all causes of action.

1. BACKGROUND

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. David Oddi v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Daniel G. Padillas v. Stork-Gamco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brenner v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. EARL v. NVR, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. Mracek v. Bryn Mawr HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. Mracek v. Bryn Mawr HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. SCHWEIKERT v. THOMAS EAGLEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API