Legal Opinion
Brenner v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 18, 2011No. Civil Action 09-01574PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF LAW
JOYNER, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Consolidated Rail Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc. (ECF No. 22). For the following reasons, the Motion shall be granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND 1
Randy K. Brenner (“Plaintiff’) has filed suit against his employers, Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) and CSX Transportation, Inc. (“CSXT”), (collectively, “Defendants”) under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60. Plaintiff was employed as a trackman and machine operator by…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. BrentMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Cowden v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2013
- Allenbaugh v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2011
- Ragland v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.