Legal Opinion
Daniel G. Padillas v. Stork-Gamco, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 31, 1999No. 97-1853PublishedCited by 164 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCHWARZER, District Judge:
Daniel Padillas was injured while washing down the blade of a drum and thigh cutter (“DTC” or “the machine”) designed, manufactured and sold by Stork-Gamco, Inc. (“Stork”) and owned and operated by his employer, Pennfield Farms. The DTC carries chicken carcasses, hanging by their legs, toward a horizontally rotating blade which separates the drumstick from the thigh. The injury occurred when the high-powered hose Padillas was using to clean the machine became entangled in the overhead conveyor and drew his left forearm into the unguarded edge of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by164 opinions
- United States v. NacchioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Carmelita Elcock v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- David Oddi v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Pearson v. Component Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- James Nelson, (Each and Every in This Class Action Suit) v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company El Paso Tennessee Pipeline CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.