Legal Opinion

Schehen v. North-West Insurance Company

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1971PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is an action on a policy of automobile liability insurance brought by plaintiff through her guardian as an assignee of the named insured. From á judgment for plaintiff entered pursuant to a jury verdict, defendant appeals.

The principal issues are an interpretation of a driver limitation endorsement upon the coverage afforded by the policy and whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain coverage for the accident in which plaintiff was injured. The endorsement provided that no coverage would be afforded by the policy while any insured automobile was being operated by any driver other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Allen v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Ferbrache v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Vaughn v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  2. Friedman v. Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  3. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co. v. Federated American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Waller v. Rocky Mountain Fire and Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Wainscott v. OssenkopAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API