Legal Opinion
Ades v. Deloitte & Touche
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 11, 1992No. 90 Civ. 4959 (RWS)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Deloitte & Touche (“D & T”), Winfried Schuberth (“Schuberth”) and David Randall (“Randall”) have moved for an order dismissing the amended complaint against them pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. 1 For the following reasons, the motion is denied.
The Parties
The plaintiffs in this action 2 (the “Investors”) are a number of individual and corporate investors who purchased promissory notes (the “Notes”) issued in August 1988 by QMAX Technology Group, Inc. (“QMAX”), a company which in 1988 was engaged in the development, manufacture and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jean v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Luce v. EdelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Cosmas v. HassettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. KPMG LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Banque Arabe Et Internationale D'Investissement v. Maryland National BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Sloane Overseas Fund, Ltd. v. Sapiens International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Friedberg v. Discreet Logic Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- In Re Oxford Health Plans, Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.