Legal Opinion
Roebuck v. Hudson Valley Farms, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 18, 2002No. 1:00-cv-01927PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
MORDUE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In the initial complaint, filed on December 15, 2000, Milton Roebuck, a migrant farm worker employed at a packing shed owned and/or operated by one or more defendants, claims that, during weeks when he and other similarly situated workers processed fruit grown on other farms, defendants failed to pay them at a rate of time and a half for work in excess of 40 hours per week as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., and Article 19, N.Y. Labor Law. 1
As a result of amendments to the complaint,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Roberta Braunstein v. Eastern Photographic Laboratories, Inc. And Heart of America Portraits, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Bayside Enterprises, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Kim Comer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Iglesias-Mendoza v. La Belle Farm, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Lee v. ABC Carpet & HomeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Rodriguez v. Almighty Cleaning, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Hamadou v. Hess Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.