Legal Opinion

State v. Lucero

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1968No. 117PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Convicted of burglary, defendant appeals. He contends the grand jury indictment (1) erroneously stated the place of the offense and (2) erroneously named the owner of the residence which was burglarized, On this basis defendant asserts the indictment was fatally defective.

The indictment charged defendant with burglary contrary to § 40A-16-3, N. M.S.A.1953. Under § 41-6-7, N.M.S.A. 1953, an indictment is valid and sufficient if it identifies the crime charged by reference to the statute establishing the offense. State v. Lott, 73 N.M. 280, 387 P.2d 855 (1963).

In addition to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. LottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State v. PekeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. RussellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. VialpandoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. State v. VigilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. State v. ParkerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. State v. WalshNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. State v. McCoyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API