State v. McCoy
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLORES, Judge.
This opinion discusses six appeals by six different Defendants who were convicted of possession of cocaine. Because the appeals raise similar substantive and procedural issues, we consolidate these appeals on our motion.
Except for Defendant Bryant, each Defendant was subjected to random urinalysis testing as a condition of probation or parole. Defendant Bryant was required to undergo urinalysis testing after probation authorities received an anonymous phone call informing them that Bryant had been using cocaine. Each Defendant tested positive for cocaine. On the basis of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Montoya De HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. OroscoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. HornadayWashington Supreme Court · 1986
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. HodgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. FranksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State Board of Nursing v. BerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. JacksonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.