Legal Opinion

State v. Walsh

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1969No. 353PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Convicted of armed robbery, (§ 40 A-16-2; N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 6)) defendant appeals raising six points for reversal. Defendant’s second part of the first point is dispositive of the appeal. We reverse for the reasons hereinafter stated.

Defendant contends in his first point that:

“THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN REFUSING TO QUASH THE INDICTMENT FOR FAILURE TO INCLUDE AN ESSENTIAL ELEMENT OF THE CRIME CHARGED AND FOR FAILURE TO INSTRUCT THE JURY ON ALL OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE CRIME CHARGED.”

THE INDICTMENT.

The indictment reads in part: “The Grand Jury Charges: * * * Charles P.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. State v. LottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. AustinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. OroscoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. BellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Manson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. GunzelmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. StephensNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API