Legal Opinion

Cushman v. Davis

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1978No. Civ. 41178PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JENKINS, J. *

This is a classic hornbook case. Concepts of easements “appurtenant” or “in gross,” and “dominant” versus “servient” tenements, which were mystifying in law school, the bane of bar examinations, and buried during long legal and judicial careers, now surface.

A [appellant] owner of Blackacre since 1976, seeks to subdivide his 16-acre parcel and obtain access by a road across Whiteacre (owned by B [respondents]) to a public street. A’s predecessor in title C [Murphy] had used the road only ten times per year—five each in February and July—to bring in equipment for spraying…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Gion v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Medhus v. DutterMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Loomis v. LuraskiMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Schmidt v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Moylan v. DykesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Applegate v. OtaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API