State v. Acree
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
Defendant appeals her conviction after a jury trial for possession of a Schedule II controlled substance. In a single assignment of error, she asserts that the trial court erred in denying her motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. ORCP 64 B(4); ORS 136.535. Assuming that the trial court made no predicate legal error, we review the court’s decision for an abuse of discretion. Oberg v. Honda Motor Co., 316 Or 263, 272, 851 P2d 1084 (1993), rev’d on other grounds, 512 US 415, 114 S Ct 2331, 129 L Ed 2d 336 (1994). We reverse and remand.
Defendant was charged with a single…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Oberg v. Honda Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State of Oregon v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. CadiganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. DikeosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- Greenwood Products, Inc. v. Greenwood Forest Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.