Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Wells

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

1. The case of Kirk v. The Fort Wayne Gas Light Company, 13 Ind. 56, settles the point that the plaintiff in this case can sue, upon the state of facts appearing by the complaint. But:

2. Is it not manifest that there is a defect of parties defendant? These are, in short, the facts. Eli Allen sold and conveyed to Jeremiah S. Merritt a tract of land, taking the notes of the latter for the purchase-money. Bor the payment of that purchase-money, Allen had, by law, a lien on the land *172in question against Merritt and purchasers from him with notice. Wells became such a purchaser of the land from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kirk v. Fort Wayne Gaslight Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Higgins v. KendallIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Union State Bank v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Scobey v. FintonIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. McCauley v. HoltzIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Johnson v. BrittonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API