Legal Opinion
Bame v. Bame
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1930No. Docket No. 46, Calendar No. 34,815PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
The trial court filed an opinion which so fully expresses the conclusion we have reached after an examination of the record, that we adopt it as our own. It reads as follows :
“The plaintiff is ten years of age. Her father was James Bame, who died April 17, 1925. Samuel Bame, father of James and grandfather of plaintiff, passed away November 21, 1928. Katherine Bame and Jennie Bame Hartsell are children of Samuel, and Ellen Bame, his widow, is 84 years of age.
“James Bame married in 1915 and separated from his wife October 13, 1921. The wife subsequently remarried and commenced this proceeding…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Twiss v. GeorgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Kimball v. BatleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Outland v. OutlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lutz v. DutmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Daugherty v. PoppenMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Hornbeck v. Midwest Realty, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Matthews v. Plymouth Community Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Reed v. ZalmMichigan Supreme Court · 1953