Legal Opinion

Reed v. Zalm

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1953No. Docket No. 69, Calendar No. 45,587PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of an alleged oral contract for the purchase of lot 30 of Hylewood subdivision, Lansing township, Ingham county, Michigan, and for a determination of the amount due defendants as a result of such sale.

In 1940, plaintiffs, Richard W. Reed and Ruby L. Reed, his wife, were residents of the city of Lansing. Defendant, Dr. Yander Zalm, was their family physician. At this time plaintiffs had 2 children and their living conditions were not entirely satisfactory. In August, 1940, plaintiff Richard W. Reed called on Dr. Vander Zalm to pay a bill. During this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Eicholtz v. GrunewaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Daugherty v. PoppenMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Steketee v. SteketeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Czeizler v. RadkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Calhoun County v. Blue Cross Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API