Legal Opinion

Outland v. Outland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1926No. Docket No. 26PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

Plaintiff, by bill in chancery, seeks to enforce against the estate of Catherine Boyd and her heirs an oral agreement'which he claims was made between him and Mrs. Boyd, a widowed sister, in 1915, by the terms of which he was to come and live with her and assist her in whatever way he could, and upon her death was to have her home in Grand Rapids. The chancellor in his opinion recognized the rule that a -court of equity might compel the specific performance of a contract of this character, if the same were established with reasonable certainty, but concluded that plaintiff had

“failed to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bame v. BameMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Farmer v. GarrettMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Wild v. WildMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API