Legal Opinion

M. MOLSEN & CO., INC. v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 6, 1977No. 6563PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PRESLAR, Chief Justice.

A Buyer of cotton brought this action against the Sellers to recover damages arising out of the failure of the Sellers to deliver cotton to the Buyer as promised orally, and for their failure to keep an oral promise to sign and deliver a written contract that would comply with the Statute of Frauds providing for the sale of the cotton. The trial Court granted the summary judgment of the Defendant-Sellers on the basis of Section 2.201 of the Texas Business & Commerce Code, Statute of Frauds. We affirm.

Kenneth Newcomb, as agent for Royce Cooley, who in turn was the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. " MOORE" BURGER, INC. v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cooper Petroleum Co. v. LaGloria Oil and Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Adams v. Petrade International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  2. Lohse v. Atlantic Richfield Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Neiss v. EhlersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Coastal Corp. v. Atlantic Richfield Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  5. Birenbaum v. Option Care, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API