Legal Opinion

Birenbaum v. Option Care, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 3, 1997No. 05-95-01088-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

MOSELEY, Justice.

We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing. We withdraw our opinion of May 2,1997 and vacate our previous judgment. The following is now the opinion of the Court.

Appellant Dennis H. Birenbaum, M.D., sued appellee Option Care, Inc., for damages arising from Option Care’s refusal to pim- chase stock owned by Birenbaum. The trial court granted Option Care’s motion for summary judgment, which argued that Biren-baum’s causes of action were barred by the statute of frauds. Birenbaum appeals on four points of error, contending: (1) the summary judgment…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Brownlee v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ford v. City State Bank of Palacios, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  2. Bank of Texas, N.A. v. Gaubert, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  3. Chambers v. Pruitt, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  4. American Home Shield Corp. v. Lahorgue, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
  5. Absolute Resource Corp. v. Hurst TrustDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API