Legal Opinion
Lucille Young v. Samuel Pierce, Jr., Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 20, 1987No. 86-2771PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RANDALL, Circuit Judge:
Defendants appeal from orders of the district court issuing an interim injunction and appointing a special master. We vacate and remand to the district court for reconsideration in light of this opinion.
I. Overview
This is one of two appeals arising from a class action lawsuit in which the plaintiff class charged that the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and certain local housing authorities in East Texas have maintained racially segregated housing in violation of the Constitution, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Young v. PierceDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1982
- Young v. PierceDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1986
- Young v. PierceDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1985
- Lucille Young v. Samuel Pierce, Jr., Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
3Cited by15 opinions
- Enplanar, Inc. v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Forest Henry Shipes, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Cross-Appellants v. Trinity Industries, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws v. MullenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Tinsley v. KempDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.