Legal Opinion
Young v. Pierce
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided July 3, 1986No. Civ. A. P-80-8-CAPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JUSTICE, Chief Judge.
An order granting the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability in this civil action was issued on July 31, 1985. Young v. Pierce, 628 F.Supp. 1037 (E.D.Tex.1985). That order held that the Department of Housing and Urban Development and its officials (“HUD”) knowingly created, promoted, and funded racially segregated housing in thirty-six counties in East Texas in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution and federal statutes. Without conceding the correctness of the finding of liability, the defendants submitted a…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. TurnageDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws v. MullenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Lucille Young v. Samuel Pierce, Jr., Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Trout v. BallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.