Legal Opinion
Young v. Pierce
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided July 1, 1982No. P-80-8-CAPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JUSTICE, Chief Judge.
The above-styled civil action is brought by Lucille Young, Virginia Wyatt and Helen Ruth Jackson, charging that the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and certain local housing authorities in East Texas have, through policy and practice, maintained racially segregated housing in violation of the Constitution and laws of the United States. Plaintiffs Young and Wyatt are residents of Clarksville, Texas; plaintiff Jackson is a resident of Pittsburg, Texas. The three plaintiffs, all black, are applicants for public housing programs 1 in the…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- N.A.A.C.P., Boston Chapter v. Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Latinos Unidos De Chelsea en Accion (Lucha) v. Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Davis-Warren Auctioneers, J v. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Williams v. GlickmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.