Legal Opinion
Young v. Pierce
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided July 31, 1985No. Civ. A. P-80-8-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JUSTICE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs in this class action allege that defendant, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), has knowingly maintained, and continues to maintain, a system of racially segregated housing in violation of the Constitution and laws of the United States. Specifically, the plaintiff class asserts that HUD, in funding and overseeing this housing, has discriminated against blacks in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq. (prohibiting…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tinsley v. KempDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1990
- Lucille Young v. Samuel Pierce, Jr., Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Mhany Management Inc. v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Young v. PierceDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1986
- Mhany Management Inc. v. Incorporated Village of Garden CityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.