Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tina M. Dahle

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2015No. 2013AP001137-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review a report filed by referee Robert E. Kinney recommending that the court suspend the Wisconsin law license of Attorney Tina M. Dahle for two years and six months; require Attorney Dahle to pay restitution as described herein; and require Attorney Dahle to pay the full costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which total $11,911.68 as of December 8, 2014. No appeal has been filed in this matter, so our review proceeds pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.17(2).

¶ 2. We adopt the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law and we agree that Attorney Dahle's license to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Proceedings Against TullyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against BultWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Hammis (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against James Edward Hammis)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew S. MacLeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. RamthunWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Hammis (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against James Edward Hammis)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API