Bindrim v. Colonial Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.
The sole issue in this consolidated appeal is whether a named operator policy issued pursuant to the financial responsibility statutes, ch. 344, Stats., is subject to the requirements of the omnibus coverage statute, sec. 632.32, Stats., which in part prohibits the exclusion of coverage to persons related by blood or marriage. 1 Section 632.32(6)(b)l. We hold that no policy issued pursuant to the financial responsibility statutes may exclude from coverage persons related to the named operator by blood or marriage as mandated by sec. 632.32(6)(b)l.
On August 15, 1988, Thomas D. Bindrim was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cardinal v. Leader National Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Klatt v. ZeraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Backhaus v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Schanke v. Wisconsin County Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Damp v. ZabelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
3Cited by2 opinions
- Armstrong v. Ypsilanti Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Bindrim v. B. & J. Insurance AgencyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995