Legal Opinion

Backhaus v. Krueger

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 11, 1985No. 84-1611PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

Floyd Backhaus appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his action against Hubert J. Kreuser and The Home Insurance Company. The trial court relied on the coemployee immunity language of sec. 102.03(2), Stats., in finding that Backhaus could not maintain this action against Kreuser and Home Insurance. We reverse because the governing insurance contract waived the statutory provision on coemployee immunity to the extent of the policy limits.

This action arises out of an automobile accident in which Backhaus, a Washington county employee, suffered injuries when he was struck by an automobile…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stanhope v. Brown CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Katze v. Randolph & Scott Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Maynard v. Port Publications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Heck & Paetow Claim Service, Inc. v. HeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Germanotta v. National Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Maas Ex Rel. Grant v. ZieglerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Raby v. MoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wagner v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  4. Bindrim v. B. & J. Insurance AgencyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Trampf v. Prudential Property & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API