Legal Opinion
Barker v. Goldberg
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 4, 1989No. CV-86-3039PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SIFTON, District Judge.
Lloyd’s of London, through its representative, Lucy Barker, commenced this declaratory judgment action against Helen Goldberg pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202. Lloyd’s seeks a declaration that it is not liable to Mrs. Goldberg for the death of her husband under the terms of a Total Accident Plan policy.
Mrs. Goldberg has counterclaimed seeking to recover benefits under the policy. The matter is currently before the Court on plaintiff’s in limine motion seeking a determination with respect to the placement of the burden of proof. For reasons…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., in No. 75-2405 v. Videfreeze Corporation, and David E. Chinnery Development Corp., Inno. 75-2406Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Reliance Life Ins. Co. v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Bauer v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. Of N. Y. v. GrassoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corp. v. Richard D. Sweeney and Ruth T. ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cincinnati Insurance v. AMSCO WindowsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2013
- Jim Henson Productions, Inc. v. John T. Brady & Associates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Saint Calle v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Allstate Insurance v. SproutDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991