Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Sprout

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1991No. Civ. A. 1: CV-90-1253PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAMBO, District Judge.

Before the court are the motions for a new trial of defendants Russell W. Mutzabaugh and Mary Jane Sprout. Trial was held before this court on March 11, 1991. At trial, defendants had been assigned the burden of proof because the action was for a declaratory judgment by an insurer seeking to exclude defendants from recovering under the insurer’s insureds’ policy. At the close of defendants’ case, this court granted a directed verdict for plaintiff, holding that defendants had not produced sufficient substantive evidence to carry their burden of proof.

Defendants…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Sample v. DiecksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., in No. 75-2405 v. Videfreeze Corporation, and David E. Chinnery Development Corp., Inno. 75-2406Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Tonkovic v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. DeBruickerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API