Legal Opinion

Charles Rubenstein, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Corp.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 5, 1957No. Civ. 4332PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, Chief Judge.

In substance it may be stated that the motion of defendant Minnesota Amusement Company is that, as to it, damages herein be limited to those accruing within two years prior to the commencement of this action, or, in the alternative, that the limitation period be set at six years. In view of this Court’s decision in Homewood Theatre v. Loew’s, Inc., D.C., 1951, 101 F.Supp. 76, that the six-year statute of limitations is applicable to antitrust suits brought upon claims arising in Minnesota, it follows that only the alternative motion of the defendant need be considered.

This…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sun Theatre Corp. v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  2. Electric Theater Co. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953
  3. Walder v. Paramount Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  4. Christensen v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1951
  5. Homewood Theatre, Inc. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1951

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State of Michigan v. Morton Salt CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1966
  2. Wilson & Co. v. United Packinghouse Wkrs. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
  3. Hardy Salt Company v. State of Illinois, Hardy Salt Company v. State of West VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  4. 2361 State Corporation v. Sealy, IncorporatedDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
  5. Baughman v. Cooper-Jarrett, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API