Legal Opinion
Hardy Salt Company v. State of Illinois, Hardy Salt Company v. State of West Virginia
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 22, 1967No. 18702, 18703PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATTHES, Circuit Judge.
These are interlocutory appeals under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) to review an order of the district court holding that the four-year statute of limitations applicable to private antitrust treble damage actions under Section 4B of the Clayton Act was tolled under Section 5(b) of that Act, 1 as to Hardy Salt Company by rea son of the pendency of government litigation against other members of the salt industry. The sole question for determination here is whether the tolling provision of Section 5 (b) of the Clayton Act, which suspends the running of the statute of limitations…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. NisleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Leh v. General Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sun Theatre Corp. v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Burnette v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
- Minnesota v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Southern Pacific Communications Company v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Goetz v. Board of Trustees, Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.