Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bank of California, N. A. v. National City Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1926No. 19609. En BancPublished

1DissentParker, J.

(dissenting) — Since the majority of the court seem to be of the opinion that the bonds here in question are clearly negotiable in every possible sense, I freely yield my assent to the elimination of the observations made by me in the Department opinion touching the law as I conceived it to be announced in Fidelity Trust Co. v. Palmer, 22 Wash. 473, 61 Pac. 158, 79 Am. St. 953; Marcus v. Ofner, 103 Wash. 478, 175 Pac. 31, and Woodworth v. School District. No. 2, 103 Wash. 677, 175 Pac. 321. In other words, I now see that those observations were unnecessary to be made in the disposition of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Manker v. American Savings Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Fidelity Trust Co. v. PalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Pedersen v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. City of Marcus v. OfnerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Woodworth v. School District No. 2Washington Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API