Legal Opinion

Woodworth v. School District No. 2

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1918No. 14572PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeals from judgments of the superior court for Stevens county, Truax, J., entered July 20, 1917, upon verdicts of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in consolidated actions on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

— These cases were before this court upon appeal from prior judgments rendered against the plaintiff, Woodworth, as assignee of the Self-Winding Clock Company, which judgments were reversed and new trials awarded to the plaintiff by our decision reported in 92 Wash. 456,159 Pac. 757, to which we now refer for a statement of the facts of the controversy. The cases were again, by agreement of the parties, tried together in the superior court for Stevens county, resulting in verdicts and judgments against the plaintiff, denying him recovery, from which he has again appealed to this court.

There…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fidelity Trust Co. v. PalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Woodworth v. School District No. 2Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. City of Marcus v. OfnerWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. School District No. 9 v. First National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bank of California v. National City Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Manker v. American Savings Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Sebring, Treas. v. FaginSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Bank of California, N. A. v. National City Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API