Legal Opinion

Manker v. American Savings Bank & Trust Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1924No. 18570PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

In April, 1923, the appellant was the owner of two local improvement bonds issued by the city of Seattle, payable out of funds to he raised by special assessment in local improvement district No. 3,032. These bonds were in that month stolen from the appellant’s safety deposit box in a hank at Yashon, Washington, and thereafter came into the possession of the respondent hank, which purchased the same in *431the due course of business. The respondent city of Seattle has the funds on hand to pay these two bonds and has called for their payment, and this litigation concerns only the question whether…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fidelity Trust Co. v. PalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Matapan National Bank v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Barker v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Cuddy v. SturtevantWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. City of Marcus v. OfnerWashington Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Vogt v. HovanderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  2. Bank of California v. National City Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Adams County v. Ritzville State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Bank of California, N. A. v. National City Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Pulaski County v. Ben Hur Life Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API