Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Thorslund

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 20, 2009No. 61590-4-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

¶1 After a bench trial, Arthur Simpson prevailed in his suit against Alan Thorslund for misappropriation of company funds, unpaid wages, and failure to repay a loan. Here, Simpson and Thorslund were found to be de facto partners, having failed to form a corporation. No full accounting of partnership assets and liabilities was ever undertaken prior to the trial court’s entry of judgment in favor of Simpson. Under the common law, a formal accounting was a prerequisite to any action between partners. But, since Washington’s adoption of the Revised Uniform Partnership Act (RUPA)1 in 1998, a full…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Hansen v. RothausWashington Supreme Court · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maier v. GiskeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. Maier v. GISKECourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API