Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Treadwell

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2015No. 6981 S-15468PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Richard Hughes, the Alaska Miners Association, and the Council of Alaska Producers (collectively referred to as "Hughes") challenged Lieutenant Governor Mead Treadwell's certification of a ballot initiative that would require final legislative approval for any large-scale metallic sulfide mining operation located within the Bristol Bay watershed. Hughes argued that the initiative violates the constitutional prohibitions on appropriation and enacting local or special legislation by initiative. Following oral argument we issued an order affirming the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boucher v. EngstromAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. McAlpine v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. LewisAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Brooks v. WrightAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alaska Conservation Foundation v. Pebble Limited PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Mallott v. Stand for SalmonAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Alaska Miners Association v. HolmanAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Jacko v. State, Pebble Ltd. PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Lieutenant Governor of the State of Alaska v. Alaska Fisheries Conservation AllianceAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API