Legal Opinion

Jacko v. State, Pebble Ltd. Partnership

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2015No. 7019 S-15516PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Lake and Peninsula Borough voters passed an initiative prohibiting large-scale mining activities that have a "significant adverse impact" on anadromous waters within the Borough. Pebble Limited Partnership and the State of Alaska pursued separate suits against the Borough, later consolidated, claiming that the initiative was preempted by state law. Two of the initiative sponsors intervened to support the initiative. The superior court granted summary judgment in favor of Pebble and the State and enjoined the Borough from enforcing the initiative. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of HutchinsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Beegan v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Jefferson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. American Civil Liberties UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hahn v. GEICO Choice Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Black v. Whitestone Estates Condo. Homeowners' Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Alaska Trappers Association, Inc., and National Trappers Association, Inc. v. City of ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Vince B. v. Sarah B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API