Legal Opinion

Horak v. State

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 6, 1976PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.

The plaintiff brought an action for money damages against the state of Connecticut and Joseph B. Burns, commissioner of transportation. The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment erasing the action from the docket for lack of jurisdiction.

The complaint alleges that on January 3, 1969, the plaintiff purchased land in Old Saybrook for construction of a building so that he could expand and promote his engineering and manufacturing business. On February 14, 1969, he engaged a building contractor, and on May 8,1969, he obtained a building permit. The building and project that had been contemplated…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  3. Karp v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Textron, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  5. Brown v. CatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Westgate, Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Upson v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Gold v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Drake v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API