Legal Opinion
Malcolm v. Ass'n of Supervisors & Adm'rs of Rochester
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided July 11, 2019No. 17-CV-6878LPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID G. LARIMER, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
Bernice C. Malcolm ("plaintiff") once again has commenced suit against her employer the Rochester City School District ("RCSD") alleging violations of federal and state laws. Malcolm is a known litigant in this Court. She is well-known because she is a demonstrable, abusive litigant. This case and two similar cases in this district (Malcolm II (17-CV-6873); Malcolm III (18-CV-6450)) against essentially the same defendants, raise the same or similar claims and all will be dismissed in three separate decisions; filed this date. For…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Curry-Malcolm v. RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- Malcolm v. Association of Supervisors and Administrators of Rochester, (ASAR)District Court, W.D. New York · 2021