Securities & Exchange Commission v. O'Hara Re-Election (Or Proxy) Committee
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, District Judge.
The petitioner, the Securities and Exchange Commission, has filed an action against the so-called O’Hara Re-election Committee and others, seeking to restrain the defendants from violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C.A. § 78a et seq., and particularly Section 14 thereof, 15 U.S.C.A. § 78n, having to do with the solicitation of proxies through the mail.
• The matter is now before me on prayers for a preliminary injunction, seeking to restrain the Re-election Committee and its members from further violations of the Act of 1934, and from the use of…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. PortaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Brown v. BullockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
- Empire Southern Gas Co. v. GrayCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.