Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. O'Hara Re-Election (Or Proxy) Committee

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 10, 1939No. 294PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, District Judge.

The petitioner, the Securities and Exchange Commission, has filed an action against the so-called O’Hara Re-election Committee and others, seeking to restrain the defendants from violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C.A. § 78a et seq., and particularly Section 14 thereof, 15 U.S.C.A. § 78n, having to do with the solicitation of proxies through the mail.

• The matter is now before me on prayers for a preliminary injunction, seeking to restrain the Re-election Committee and its members from further violations of the Act of 1934, and from the use of…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  2. Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. PortaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  3. Brown v. BullockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
  5. Empire Southern Gas Co. v. GrayCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API