Legal Opinion
Hampton v. Long
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided March 28, 1988No. Civ. A. TY-84-541-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JUSTICE, Chief Judge.
Before the court in the above-entitled and numbered action is the motion of one defendant, the Texas American Bank— Town North (Bank), for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the motion shall be granted in part, and denied as to the rest.
In his complaint, plaintiff Charles Hampton (Hampton) alleges that the defendants violated the 1934 Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78a et seq., the Texas Securities Act, Tex.Civ.Stat. arts. 581-1 et seq., various Texas stock fraud statutes, see Tex.Bus. & Commerce C. §§ 27.01 et seq., and the civil provisions of…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lesbrookton, Inc. v. Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1990
- Matter of ChapmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Ritchie v. Carvel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- MBIA Insurance v. Royal Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- United States v. LangDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.