Legal Opinion

Ritchie v. Carvel Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 20, 1989No. 87 Civ. 8856(PNL)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LEVAL, District Judge.

Defendant Carvel Corp. moves to dismiss the complaint for improper venue, contending that this action may be brought only in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Westchester County. Defendant’s motion is granted.

Background

On June 8, 1984 plaintiffs Robert Ritchie and Susan Ritchie entered into a Carvel Retail Manufacturer’s License Agreement under which they were licensed to manufacture and sell Carvel products in a Carvel franchise in Mesa, Arizona. Plaintiff Paul Fialkin entered into a similar agreement with Carvel on October 3,1984 with respect…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sun Forest Corp. v. ShviliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  2. Matter of ChapmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  3. Falconwood Financial Corp. v. GriffinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  4. J.B. Harris, Inc. v. Razei Bar Industries, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
  5. Water Energizers Ltd. v. Water Energizers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API