State v. Cheney
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*403HASELTON, P. J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence for four counts of sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 163.427. He assigns error to: (1) the trial court’s failure to grant a mistrial based on improper “vouching” by the prosecutor in her rebuttal closing argument; and (2) the court’s denial of his motions for a new trial or to interview jurors based on allegations that jurors had discussed extra-record information during their deliberations. We conclude that defendant did not timely object to the prosecutor’s “vouching” and that the trial court was not obligated…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Carter v. MoberlyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BoauodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Pinnell v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. CamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. WasylukCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. McCurryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.