Legal Opinion

State v. Cheney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 13, 2000No. 98011CR; CA A105204PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*403HASELTON, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence for four counts of sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 163.427. He assigns error to: (1) the trial court’s failure to grant a mistrial based on improper “vouching” by the prosecutor in her rebuttal closing argument; and (2) the court’s denial of his motions for a new trial or to interview jurors based on allegations that jurors had discussed extra-record information during their deliberations. We conclude that defendant did not timely object to the prosecutor’s “vouching” and that the trial court was not obligated…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Carter v. MoberlyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BoauodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Pinnell v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. CamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. WasylukCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. McCurryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API