Legal Opinion
Masco Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 24, 2000No. 99-93 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DAMICH, Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498, Masco Corporation (the Plaintiff) has sued the United States (the Defendant) for infringement of two of its patents, United States Patent Nos. 5,540,068 and 5,778,711. These patents are for electronic combination locks. Both patents are continuations of United States Patent No. 5,307,656. The United States has brought in, as Third-Party Defendants, Mas-Hamilton Group, Mosler, Inc. and Hamilton Products Group, Inc. The Third-Party Defendants manufacture (Mas-Hamilton Group, Inc.) the accused device or incorporate the accused device…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Vivid Technologies, Inc. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Masco Corporation v. United States, and Mosler, Inc. And Hamilton Products Group, Inc., Third Party and Mas-Hamilton Group, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Entergy Nuclear Fitzpatrick, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Masco Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Masco Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003