Masco Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
This case comes to the Court for a decision after remand. The Federal Circuit has asked this Court to consider whether Masco’s patents are literally infringed by the Government’s X-07 lock, or whether the patents are infringed under the doctrine of equivalents. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds Masco’s patents are not infringed either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.
I. Background
Masco sued the United States for infringement of its patents describing electronic…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Mary Ann Jay and Michael H. Jay, as Legal Representatives of Matthew Michael Jay, Deceased v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003