Legal Opinion

Masco Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 8, 2001No. 99-93 CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*338 OPINION

DAMICH, Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on infringement, filed on June 23, 2000, and the Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment of non-infringement, filed on November 1, 2000. For the reasons enumerated below, the Court GRANTS the Defendant’s cross-motion and DENIES the Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as moot.

I. Background

Plaintiff Masco Corporation alleges that the United States infringed two of its patents, United States Patent Nos. 5,540,068 (“the ’068 patent”) and 5,778,711 (“the ’711 patent”). These patents are for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Wahpeton Canvas Co. v. Frontier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  5. Mas-Hamilton Group v. Lagard, Inc., (Now Known as Masco Corporation) and Hi-Shear Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Masco Corporation v. United States, and Mosler, Inc. And Hamilton Products Group, Inc., Third Party and Mas-Hamilton Group, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Kollmorgen Corp. v. Yaskawa Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2001
  3. Shields v. Reader's Digest Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  4. Masco Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API