Legal Opinion
Crittenden v. S.F. Savings Union
California Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 1910No. L. A. 2329PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Richards & Carrier, and James L. Crittenden, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal from an order striking from the files two memoranda of costs filed by the appellants herein in the superior court, embracing the alleged costs of certain former appeals to this- court. .
In the action of Kate M. Bell and James L. Crittenden v. San Francisco Savings Union, the defendant San Francisco Savings Union, upon a cross-complaint, obtained judgment for the foreclosure and sale of the land which was the subject .of the suit, for the purpose of paying a large sum of money to the San Francisco Savings Union out of the proceeds thereof. Teresa Bell moved for a new trial.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bell v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crenshaw v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Swallow v. First State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Ellison v. HodgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- O'Hare v. Peacock Dairies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938