Legal Opinion

Pavek v. Ceska Farmarska Vzajemne Pojistujici Spolecnost

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 28, 1938No. 31,710PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Relator applies for a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the district court of Rice county, and the clerk thereof, to transfer the files in an action brought by William Pavek, plaintiff, against Ceska Farmarska Vzajemne Pojistujici Spolecnost, defendant. The action was entitled and commenced in the district court of Rice county. Within the required time defendant served and filed a demand for change of venue supported by an affidavit of defendant’s counsel reciting: “that at the time of the commencement of this action and at all times since the commencement of said action, the above named…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Minneapolis Threshing-Machine Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. State Ex Rel. McClellan Paper Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Aetna Life Insurance v. Janesville State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dworsky v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. Schmitt v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Agricultural Insurance v. Midwest Technical Development Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Ceska Farmarska Vzajemne Pojistujici Spolecnost v. PavekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. McArthur v. Dunham-Scott CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API